Teesta Setalvad and Javed Anand get Anticipatory Bail in Khoj Case
February 13, 2019
The Khoj case, like a few more before it, was filed in 2018 by Rais Khan, a disgruntled former employee of the NGO Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP), for which Setalvad and Anand are trustees, and where Setalvad serves as Secretary. Khan made a series of baseless allegations in his FIR, suggesting Setalvad and Anand got funds for their education NGO Khoj under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, but the funds so obtained were utilised for personal purposes.
The complaint also states that the fund were used to create and distribute printed materials that could cause communal disharmony. Khan first tried to get the CBI, then the MHRD to lodge this complaint. When that did not work, his allies in the Crime Branch, Ahmedabad, came to his aid.
Both Setalvad and Anand have cooperated fully with investigations ever since the allegations were first made in March 2018, but the state kept pushing for custody in a bid to imprison and even possibly torture the activists.
On April 5, Justice Revati Mohite Dere of the Bombay High Court granted interim transit bail until May 2, 2018 to Setalvad and Anand. As per the orders of the Hon’ble Court, Teesta Setalvad and Javed Anand appeared before the Ahmedabad Crime Branch at 10 a.m on April 6. Both gave their statements in response to all the questions put to them until after 5 p.m. They also submitted all necessary documentary evidence to aid investigations.
On May 24, 2018, the Ahmedabad Sessions Court turned down the Anticipatory Bail Application (ABA) of CJP Secretary and acclaimed human rights defender Teesta Setalvad and her partner Javed Anand. However, an undeterred Setalvad refused to be cowed by the pressure tactics employed by a vicious and vindictive state, and challenged the order in the Gujarat High Court.
The court heard the matter and reserved judgement on August 24, 2018, and finally delivered the judgement on February 8, 2019, after deliberating for close to six months.
Setalvad and Anand have been targeted frequently
Setalvad and Anand have been battling a series of false cases, of which the Khoj case was the latest. Clearly, the path-breaking work by CJP, spearheaded by Setalvad, that has ensured the conviction of close to 170 persons — over 120 of which to life imprisonment – is the single most significant reason for her being singled out by a vindictive regime.
The continued historical legal battle in the form of the Zakia Jafri case is also a serious thorn in the flesh for the powers that be. Curtailing Setalvad and Anand’s personal freedoms and threatening incarceration is clearly the preferred way of this regime.
So far, Teesta Setalvad, a human rights defender with three decades of courageous work behind her, has had to seek anticipatory bail in false criminal cases eight times even prior to the Khoj case. Anand too, has now been falsely implicated three times.
Who is Rais Khan
Since 2010, thirty two months after Rais Khan was discontinued from services of field coordinator of CJP, a remunerative post where rental accommodation was also provided, he has literally been forum-shopping, and at the root of several malicious and false cases against first Setalvad alone, then both Anand and Setalvad. Setalvad was first targeted in 2004 through wings of the Gujarat state who induced star witness, Zahira Shaikh.
A Supreme Court-appointed Registrar General report completely exonerated Setalvad and CJP of baseless charges and found Zahira guilty of inducement by influential politicians. She was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment in 2006. Allegations against Setalvad have ranged from kidnapping to perjury, to now financial embezzlement.
Clearly, today, Khan, who enjoys the patronage of the regime in Delhi, having been appointed to the Central Wakf Board, also has senior counsel closely associated with the ruling party appearing for him. Since September 2010 his forum-shopping has meant his approaching five trial courts specially hearing the Gujarat 2002 cases, the Nanavaty Shah Commission, the SIT and now the Crime Branch of the Gujarat police.
In two cases, in the Sardarpura matter and the Naroda Patiya matter, the judgments have passed remarks against Khan, labelling his conduct as interference in the administration of justice.
First published in CJP.
Donate to the Indian Writers' Forum, a public trust that belongs to all of us.